Files
goldeneye-pc-port/docs/dev/agentic-development.md
T

294 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
title: Agentic Development
description: A case study in two AI coding agents porting a Nintendo 64 game to PC; the setup, timeline, handoff workflow, and an honest assessment of what worked.
---
## Agentic development: two AI coding agents porting GoldenEye 007
*How this port was actually built: a local open-weight model (Qwen 3.8 on a
single RTX 5090) and a hosted frontier model (Claude / Claude Code) handing
work back and forth through shared written notes, under one person's
part-time direction. The goal, the setup, the timeline, and an honest read on
what did and didn't work.*
## Contents
- [Why this project exists](#why-this-project-exists)
- [The setup](#the-setup)
- [Timeline](#timeline)
- [By the numbers](#by-the-numbers); [Commit velocity](#commit-velocity) · [Who did what](#who-did-what)
- [The handoff workflow](#the-handoff-workflow)
- [Assessment](#assessment)
## Why this project exists
The playable port is real, but it is not the primary deliverable. The goal was
to **test how well coding agents hold up on a large, unfamiliar, low-level
codebase**; one with none of the properties that make web-app work easy for
an LLM:
- ~230 translation units of decompiled Nintendo 64 game C, compiled
**unmodified**;
- big-endian, 32-bit, MIPS ABI assumptions throughout, run on a little-endian
64-bit host;
- bugs that surface as a fault or a garbled frame hundreds of milliseconds
after the actual cause, often in a different subsystem;
- a graphics coprocessor (the RSP) that has to be emulated in software before
anything draws at all.
Concretely it set out to validate a **two-agent arrangement**: a
locally-hosted open-weight model doing the bulk of the work on a single
consumer GPU, a hosted frontier model brought in for a collaborative phase,
and, the part that turned out most interesting, the two **handing work back
and forth** through shared written artifacts, directed by one human.
## The setup
| | |
|---|---|
| Local agent | `unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL` on a single **NVIDIA RTX 5090**, driven mainly through the **[pi](https://pi.dev/)** coding agent. Unsloth Desktop (Unsloth's local model runtime, which can drive agents such as Claude Code) was also trialed but not used significantly. |
| Hosted agent | **Claude**, via **Claude Code**, on a Claude Pro subscription; mostly **Sonnet 5**, with **Opus 5** used as an escalation tier for the hardest problems and whenever there was subscription budget to spend on it |
| Human | one person: direction, work partitioning, integration, and every build / playtest / frame-capture the agents could not run |
| Base | fork of the [GoldenEye 007 decompilation](https://github.com/n64decomp/007) (years of prior work by Larry Ficken ("kholdfuzion") and contributors) |
| Reused | the [Perfect Dark PC port](https://github.com/fgsfdsfgs/perfect_dark)'s `fast3d` software RSP; same Rare engine family |
The port is the GoldenEye-specific porting work **on top of** those two
existing bodies of work; it is not a from-scratch reimplementation of either.
In practice the models formed a **three-tier escalation**: the local model
handled well-scoped work, Sonnet 5 took what it stalled on, and Opus 5 was
reserved for the bugs that needed the most reasoning held at once; the same
"escalate when stuck" move applied at every level.
## Timeline
All dates from this repository's own commit history (August–September 2026).
```mermaid
gantt
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
axisFormat %b %d
title GoldenEye 007 PC port; from fork to v0.3.0
section Local model - Qwen 3.8 via pi
Fork + PC-port scaffolding :m1, 2026-08-16, 1d
Full compile + link (~230 TUs) :m2, 2026-08-20, 1d
Boot to window (ROM map + SDL2) :m3, 2026-08-20, 1d
OS shims, threads, fast3d integration :2026-08-21, 2d
First rendered frames :m4, 2026-08-22, 1d
Offline asset-conversion pipeline :2026-08-22, 2d
Entire intro renders (logos to cast) :m5, 2026-08-24, 1d
section Both agents - handoff workflow
Claude joins :milestone, 2026-08-27, 0d
Stage load; Bunker 1 renders + firefight :2026-08-27, 2d
21 solo levels load + render + no-crash :m6, 2026-08-29, 1d
SDL input layer (kbd/mouse/gamepad) :2026-08-29, 1d
Front-end flow (menu to briefing to start) :m7, 2026-08-30, 1d
File-backed EEPROM saves :2026-08-31, 1d
section Month one - front end to v0.3.0
Audio mixer (music + SFX) :2026-09-02, 7d
Steam Deck hardening + F10 overlay QoL :2026-09-14, 3d
Final fix sweep (D309-D321) + release review :2026-09-18, 3d
v0.3.0 released (full campaign playtested) :milestone, 2026-09-20, 0d
```
- **Day 0** (16 Aug): repository forked, PC-port scaffolding added.
- **Day 4** (20 Aug): the entire ~230-TU game + libultra set compiles and
links as a host binary.
- **Day 6** (22 Aug): first real frames render.
- **Day 8** (24 Aug): the whole intro sequence renders; logos, gun-barrel,
cast roll.
- **Day 11** (27 Aug): second agent joins.
- **Day 13** (29 Aug): **all 21 solo missions load, render, and survive an
unattended play window without crashing.**
- **Day 14** (30–31 Aug): front end playable end to end (menu → mission
select → difficulty → briefing → start); file-backed saves.
- **Day 35** (20 Sep): **v0.3.0 released** — the full campaign playtested
end to end at Agent difficulty, audio complete, bundles for Windows,
Linux and Steam Deck.
So roughly **two weeks**, one person part-time, to take a decompilation from
"builds an N64 ROM" to "boots on desktop, renders every solo level, playable
through the front end into the early game". The rest of month one (29 Aug –
20 Sep) took it from there to a public release: the 21-level sweep to
full-campaign completion, the audio mixer, input and Steam Deck polish,
widescreen FOV scaling, and the v0.3.0 bundles — with a set of cosmetic
issues documented rather than outstanding.
## By the numbers
| | |
|---|---|
| Calendar time | 36 days (16 Aug – 20 Sep 2026), one person part-time |
| Commits on the port | ~835 |
| Root-caused bugs logged | `D1`–`D321` in [`findings.md`](https://github.com/jkdansereau/goldeneye-pc-port/blob/main/docs/dev/findings.md), 199 tracked entries in the index (some labels later merged or withdrawn) |
| Handoff sessions | 190+ (`M-2` … `M-192`, and counting) |
| Game-source files given `#ifdef PORT` ABI edits | 71 files, ~385 blocks |
| New port-layer / tooling files | ~119 |
| Port layer | ~24,450 lines C/C++ (`port/`) |
| PC asset-conversion tooling | ~7,180 lines Python (`tools_pc/`) |
| Outcome | **v0.3.0 released**: full campaign playable end to end (all 21 missions playtested at Agent difficulty) at a steady 60 fps, full audio (music + SFX), file-backed saves; Windows, Linux and Steam Deck; known cosmetic defects documented in the finding log |
### Commit velocity
```mermaid
xychart-beta
title "Commits per day - August 2026"
x-axis ["8/16", "8/17", "8/20", "8/21", "8/22", "8/23", "8/24", "8/27", "8/28", "8/29", "8/30", "8/31"]
y-axis "commits" 0 --> 90
bar [1, 2, 2, 6, 9, 2, 4, 7, 57, 39, 39, 46]
```
```mermaid
xychart-beta
title "Commits per day - September 2026"
x-axis ["9/1", "9/2", "9/3", "9/4", "9/5", "9/6", "9/7", "9/8", "9/9", "9/10", "9/11", "9/12", "9/13", "9/14", "9/15", "9/16", "9/17", "9/18", "9/19", "9/20"]
y-axis "commits" 0 --> 90
bar [11, 52, 39, 8, 8, 2, 8, 34, 17, 30, 20, 30, 57, 4, 84, 38, 22, 13, 2, 6]
```
Days with no commits are omitted (18–19 and 25–26 Aug). The step up from
8/28 onward is the collaborative phase in full swing, including the parallel
multi-agent "bursts"; the 9/15 spike is the Steam Deck playtest-feedback
batch landing at once.
### Who did what
```mermaid
pie showData title "Commits by agent (raw count, snapshot through early September)"
"Claude" : 161
"Local model (Qwen 3.8 / pi)" : 62
```
(Phase A, the first 26 commits, to 24 Aug, was entirely the local model,
solo; from 27 Aug on the two agents worked in parallel. The raw tally was
not re-run for the final third of the project; treat the milestone-weighted
estimate below as the better number.)
| Milestone / workstream | Primary agent | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| PC build system, region macros, full compile + link of ~230 units | local model | large |
| Boot chain: ROM map, OS-shim layer (`libultra.c`), host threads, dual-mapped DRAM | local model | large |
| Software-RSP integration + replacement scheduler (`gesched.c`) | local model | medium |
| Offline asset-conversion architecture + first converters (`tools_pc/`) | local model | large |
| Intro rendering (logos → gun-barrel → cast) | local model | medium |
| Stage load unblocked (`D69`–`D87`) | Claude | medium |
| 21-level crash sweep; ~12 crash classes root-caused (`D88`–`D169`) | Claude | large |
| SDL input layer (keyboard / mouse / gamepad, mouse-look) | Claude | medium |
| Front-end flow (menu → briefing → start), EEPROM saves | Claude | medium |
| Parallel struct-layout / converter static audits | local model | medium |
| Continuing tasks after Claude hit a usage limit | local model | small |
| The hardest structural bugs (matrix handedness, format specs) | Claude | n/a |
| Every build, playtest, frame capture, integration, and direction | human | n/a |
**Estimated effort split.** The raw commit count above (~28% local / ~72%
Claude) undercounts the local model: Phase A landed the build system and boot
chain in relatively few, large commits, and the local model kept contributing
~15–20% of Phase B in parallel. Weighting by milestone difficulty rather than
raw commits; the foundation is a heavier third of the project than its commit
share suggests; the developer's estimate is roughly:
```mermaid
pie showData title "Agent effort, milestone-weighted"
"Claude" : 60
"Local model (Qwen 3.8 / pi)" : 40
```
The local model's ~40% is front-loaded and foundational (the build, the boot
chain, the RSP wiring, the converter architecture) plus continuous parallel
support; Claude's ~60% is the higher-volume Phase-B debugging, the two big
discrete features, and the hardest structural bugs. A 27B open-weight model on
one consumer GPU carrying the entire foundation of a project like this is the
result worth taking away.
## The handoff workflow
This is the part worth paying attention to.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
H["Human: direction, integration,<br/>build + playtest verification"]
C["Claude / Claude Code<br/>frontier, hosted"]
Q["Qwen 3.8 via pi<br/>open-weight, local RTX 5090"]
D[(Shared artifacts:<br/>HANDOFF.md · findings.md · porting-notes.md)]
H -->|scopes task, budget, files| C
H -->|scopes task, budget, files| Q
C <-->|reads / appends| D
Q <-->|reads / appends| D
C -.->|usage limit reached| Q
Q -.->|hard structural bug| C
C -->|patch + write-up| H
Q -->|patch + write-up| H
```
Both agents worked against the **same three written artifacts**, which is what
let them substitute for each other:
1. **`HANDOFF.md`**; the current state, the immediate next task, and the
environment gotchas. Originally a session-to-session note for one agent, it
became the **interface between the two agents**: when Claude reached a
usage limit mid-problem, the local model picked the task up from the
HANDOFF state and continued; when the local model hit a bug that needed
deeper structural reasoning, it wrote up where it was and Claude took over.
2. **`findings.md`**; the chronological finding log. 321 numbered `D`
entries by v0.3.0 (199 tracked in the index; some labels merged or
withdrawn), each a root cause with `file:line` evidence and the fix. New
agents (either model) are pointed at the relevant entries before they
start.
3. **`porting-notes.md`**; the append-only "recurring bug classes" file. The
single highest-leverage artifact: it stopped both models from
re-deriving the same class of N64→PC bug over and over.
Around these, the working rules (full detail in
[`../dev-process.md`](../dev-process.md)):
- **file-partitioned tasks**; each agent's task scoped to a disjoint set of
files so patches never collided;
- **visible budgets**; every investigation task carried an explicit
"N build→run cycles" limit and a defined fallback (revert probes, write up
with a confidence rating);
- **the human owns verification**; building, running the game, capturing a
frame, and judging it against N64 reference footage was never delegated.
## Assessment
Honest notes, for anyone weighing whether this transfers.
**Worked well**
- The **local model carried the groundwork phase**; build system, boot
chain, OS shims, and the offline-converter architecture. None of it was
rewritten later. A 27B open model on one consumer GPU was genuinely productive
on this.
- **The written-artifact discipline made agent output compound.** An agent
starting cold late in the project was more effective than one early on,
because the accumulated notes were good. This is also what made the two
models interchangeable on a given task.
- **Handoff on limit** turned Claude's usage cap from a hard stop into a
slowdown; the local model kept the problem moving.
- Bounded behavioural bugs (a truncated pointer, a byte-swap off by one) are a
good fit for an agent given a tight loop and a reference to diff against.
**Worked poorly / needed the human**
- **Anything requiring the running game.** Build, playtest, capture a frame,
decide whether it looks right; that loop was the human's job throughout,
and it was the bottleneck.
- **Non-deterministic bugs.** Frame-timing stalls and concurrent-build
flakiness repeatedly fooled agents into "fixing" regressions that were not
real. A number of findings are corrections of earlier findings.
- **Long structural bugs** (matrix handedness, a whole serialized-format
spec) often ended in a "here is what I know, confidence medium" writeup
rather than a fix, even with the budget raised.
- **The capability gap is a gradient, not a wall.** The local model was strong
on well-scoped work and weaker when a bug needed several interacting facts
held at once; those went to Sonnet 5, and the few that stalled Sonnet went
to Opus 5. Each tier earned its place on the problems the tier below it
couldn't close.
**Still outstanding** (the v0.3.0 known-issues list): cosmetic rendering
defects (particle colours, Surface 1 billboard trees, front-end logos, water
seam), stretched-not-native widescreen, PAL/JP support, a controller
rebinding UI, and macOS/ARM builds. See the README's Status section and
[`GRAPHICS-BACKLOG.md`](https://github.com/jkdansereau/goldeneye-pc-port/blob/main/docs/dev/GRAPHICS-BACKLOG.md).